header image
 

Lee Zurik Appreciation Post

WWL-TV’s own Lee Zurik, dragonslayer extraordinaire gets high praise from the NOLA Blogosphere as a champion of all things right in this town.

Watching him on WWL-TV is a pleasure. His exterior is soft and non-threatening, and his voice is smooth, easygoing and peaceful - he never raises his voice to anyone. Unlike Dennis Woltering who is aggressive and goes for the jugular, when Zurik interviews his subjects he gains their trust and asks his questions so gently that it must be hard for them not to reply. It is a pleasure to watch Zurik, unlike Woltering who seems to have the ability to make his television viewer squirm in their seat during his stories. But don’t let the cool calm facade fool you, Zurik is the only TV newsman that has taken the time to dig deep into the corruption and pathetic apathy of the people in power who are shoveling this city into the ground and to attack their achilles heels in the name of fair play and justice for New Orleans.

Case in point are a few expose’ pieces he presented recently on WWL

First is his piece on the floodwalls in St. Bernard Parish stuffed with newspaper

and the second is his piece on a New Orleans city contract with a 311 vendor

and here is a follow up piece on New Orleans’ city contract with a 311 vendor

Friday morning on WWL radio, the city of New Orleans intergovernmental relations director Kenya Smith answered questions about an Eyewitness News investigation in which experts and city council members said the city was paying about $17 million for a 3-year contract for 311 non-emergency service.

Smith, who would not agree to an interview with WWL-TV before or after the report, contended that the city budget caps the money allowed to pay any contract for the 311 system at $3.7 million.

Friday afternoon ACS, the company contracted to provide 311 service told us they interpreted the agreement somewhat differently, saying the contract costs just under $7 million for 3 years, because they aren’t providing service currently for everything spelled out in the contract.

That contradicts Rutgers University at Newark professor Robert Schick, who in the Eyewitness News story said he interpreted the contract to be worth as much as $32 million for six years.

Mayor Ray Nagin walks away from the camera as a WWL-TV producer attempts to ask questions about the 311 service contract Friday.

“If he based it on us paying $23 or $28 million instead of the $3 million or so dollars, then that analysis is fundamentally flawed to begin with,” said Smith. “No professional can do an analysis without speaking with the people involved.”

City council members say they also still have many questions about the contract, including trying to find out just how much the city’s contractor was paid in 2007, how much they’ll earn in 2008, and what that money’s going towards.

Among other questions remaining: Why did city council members, the inspector general, a professor and an administrator of a major city’s 311 call center all interpret the contract to be worth as much as $28 million.

And that doesn’t explain the alleged under performance of the 311 system or why 311 operators send complaints to city departments and why some say complaints get lost.

“Why is it you can call the operator, you can give the information to her, she calls the department, and at that point it goes into a black hole,” asked Councilwoman Cynthia Hedge-Morrell.

An Eyewitness News crew tried to ask Mayor Nagin questions about the program’s performance and price and as he walked away from the cameras, he said he would not comment.

“I ain’t helping you sensationalize nothing,” he said. “You can go and find that information somewhere else.”

After requesting an on-camera interview with a representative of the city for weeks on this story, the city issued a statement just before 5 p.m. Friday, blasting the report.

“It is apparent from the report that the contract was misinterpreted and misread, which is negligent and unfair to our citizens, especially during this time of recovery,” said the statement.

The city said that the contract states the maximum sum paid to the contractor in 2007 would be $3.2 million, $500,00 less than the figure Smith gave on the radio Friday.

The city said the 311 contract is for one year, with options for renewal every year after that. They have not said how much the contract is worth in 2008, nor for any renewal thereafter.

Here the teflon mayor high-tails it away from Zurik as he barks I ain’t helping you sensationalize nothing, you can go and find that information somewhere else.

And the latest expose’ on Jay Blossman, the Entergy employee “fund soliciting” Public Service Commissioner

He is quite impressive and I for one am thankful he chose to broaden his horizons beyond reporting sports to reporting the hard stories that just might keep New Orleans respectable and elevate it beyond the incompetence (note picture immediately above) she is mired in right now.

Thank you Lee Zurik, thank you so very much from the bottom of mine, and many other NOLA bloggers hearts…

You just can’t have it both ways…

So while sipping coffee this morning and reading the latest Gambit Weekly, I encountered this editorial on the recent Creationism bill of the regular session. I then recalled another recent Gambit commentary from April 15, 2008 concerning keeping the motorcycle helmet law intact. This segment in the creationism commentary got me shaking my head.

After all the hard work that Gov. Bobby Jindal and lawmakers did to improve our state’s image by passing tough new ethics laws and lowering business taxes earlier this year, the last thing Louisiana needs now is to portray itself to the world as an intellectual backwater. The notion of separation of church and state is so fundamental to our system of government that the Founding Fathers — most if not all of whom were men of deep religious convictions — embedded it in the First Amendment…It is sad to watch our Legislature kowtow to those who want their own religious beliefs to shape public education. History has taught us how dangerous that can be. Centuries ago, the Inquisition placed Galileo under arrest for recognizing that the sun did not revolve around the earth. Here in Louisiana, we need only look back to 1987 to see what happened the last time the Legislature tried to inject religion into science class. The courts struck down the law that required “scientific creationism” to be taught alongside evolution. No doubt the Louisiana Science Education Act will meet the same fate — at great cost to taxpayers and to recent efforts to improve Louisiana’s image.

And then this recent editorial commentary by the Times Picayune concerning guns in colleges and vo-tech schools. Note italicized commentary below.

Rep. Wooton’s measure would not make campuses safer — in fact it would undermine efforts to do so by weakening existing prohibitions on weapons and tying the hands of school officials. That’s not a rational course of action, particularly at a time when safety and security are primary concerns of students and their parents.

Guns and students are a potentially volatile mix. Adjusting to the freedoms and responsibilities of college life proves daunting for some young people who might struggle with depression and other mental health issues or abuse alcohol. Adding guns to that equation isn’t smart and seems more likely to create dangerous situations than to forestall them.

So what is the point? The point is, the Times Picayune and the Gambit Weekly both endorsed the Republican for governor, as well as endorsing Republican candidates for elected offices. So if you’re going to stick your neck out and support candidates who are ideologically conservative, are pro-gun, pro-life, and pro-religion, then don’t you dare whine when these right wingers pass legislation that fails to consider common sense initiatives. Guns in school? Sure, lets give everyone a .38. Creationism? Yeah baby, fall on your knees and pray that fossils and wayward tails never existed. Intellectual backwater? Well what the hell did you expect T-P and Gambit editors, endorsing these wankers would then bend them to your more liberal, sensitive, rational beliefs? Ha ha ha…

Many many people read T-P and Gambit and rely on their supposedly “unbiased” endorsements for voting guidance. They either don’t have the time, or maybe don’t care to research the issues themselves so the media opinion is digested and voted on. Exactly how much worse would this state be now if one of the other 3 candidates, Democrat or Independent would have received your endorsement? Someone more in sync with and who will likely support the opinions of those editorials. All three had significant business acumen, but y’all chose to toss your hat into the ring of the gypsy office hopping “y” crowd. And now you weakly bleat within your irrelevant editorials supporting liberal causes? Shut up and deal with it the next four years, you made the bed, so tough it out…

Termites are swarming

Its that time of the year again - turn off all your outside lights and check your termite contracts…

Federal Judge Stanwood Duval - part 2

Yesterday, Judge Duval ruled that the ACoE can be sued over the MR-GO flooding during Katrina since it is a shipping channel and was not intended for flood protection - read below

Judge: Corps can be sued for flood
by The Times-Picayune
Friday May 02, 2008, 10:33 PM

By Susan Finch
Staff writer

A federal court judge cleared the way Friday for the Army Corps of Engineers to face trial on claims that defects in its Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet destroyed wetlands and turned the navigation channel into a funnel for storm surge.

U.S. District Judge Stanwood Duval’s 40-page ruling “paves the way for the first and only trial that will likely be held on how the Army Corps of Engineers drowned New Orleans” during Hurricane Katrina, said California attorney Pierce O’Donnell, who leads the legal team that filed the case two years ago on behalf of a group of plaintiffs that includes WDSU-TV anchorman Norman Robinson, who lived in eastern New Orleans.

The suit alleges the controversial shipping channel flooded thousands of homes in eastern New Orleans, the Lower 9th Ward and St. Bernard Parish.

A spokesman for the U.S. Justice Department, which is defending the corps, declined comment, saying department attorneys needed time to review the ruling.

Duval’s decision rejected the corps’ argument for tossing out the case without a trial: that a federal law makes the agency immune from lawsuits over damage caused by its flood protection projects.

But Duval said that because the MRGO — a deep draft navigation channel built over a decade starting in 1958 — is not a part of the Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity Hurricane Protection plan, the Corps can be held liable for damage caused by the waterway.

Duval cautioned that his ruling does not hold the corps liable, a matter he said he can decide only after “questions of material fact” about what caused the flooding can be examined at trial.

O’Donnell predicted that if the trial ends with the judge ruling for the plaintiffs, then anyone who lives in the affected areas — eastern New Orleans, the Lower 9th Ward and St. Bernard Parish — will be entitled to collect compensation from the corps, “subject to proving their damage.”

O’Donnell said his team will also go to bat for residents in part of New Orleans that flooded after drainage canal levees broke after Katrina — damage for which Duval has already said the corps cannot be sued.

“We are going to the new Congress in January, hopefully with a judgment in our hands, and we are going to say we need a 9/11 style Katrina Victim’s compensation fund,” O’Donnell said.

In the Friday decision, according to O’Donnell, Duval said the plaintiffs had offered “substantial evidence” that the storm water that surged through the MR-GO and into residents’ homes overwhelmed hurricane protection levees.

The rocket scientists in the State Capital voted to allow college students to bear arms on campus

First creationism, now this? The leges in red stick voted to allow college students to bear arms? Those with concealed weapons permits of course. And what if some student gets angry in class and decides to blow away their professor? Maybe the leges should allow this in all state buildings, so there will be folks at the capital walking around the leges, armed and locked and loaded. Think of it this way too - do you want your child sitting next to a student packing a pistol? Would these leges want this for THEIR children, say at LSU?

Note the New Orleans area leges that voted for this bill - Joseph Lopinto, R-Metairie; Nick Lorusso, R-New Orleans; John Schroder, R-Covington; Gary Smith, D-Norco; Ricky Templet, R-Gretna

Panel OKs campus guns - bill moves to full House for debate

Mike Hasten
mhasten@gannett.com

BATON ROUGE - College students should be allowed to carry concealed weapons on campus to protect themselves and others, a House committee decided Thursday over pleas from campus officials that it would lead to chaos.

Students on both sides of the issue said they were concerned about safety.

Supporters of the proposal said if students were allowed to carry guns on campus, they could have helped stop some of the recent shootings on college campuses around the country.

“For me, it’s not fair that we are not able to defend ourselves,” said Geoffrey Green, a student at Southeastern Louisiana University who urged approval of the measure. Green was joined by one other student who addressed the committee but a number of others submitted cards in support.

Cinnamon Salvador, chief of campus police at McNeese State University, said the belief that armed students could have stopped campus shootings is “fantasy.” Their guns “would more likely be used against each other.”

College student leaders and Commissioner of Higher Education Joseph Savoie argued that allowing guns on campus could lead to more violence.

Kyle Chandler, a student at LSU in Baton Rouge who said he grew up with guns and hunted since he was 6 years old, said “I don’t trust myself or any of my fellow students to carry guns.” He said he was concerned about “vigilante justice.”

“This bill will not create a safe environment on campus,” said Steven Jackson, one of three Grambling State University students to address the panel. Instead, it would “create a hostile environment.”

He reminded the committee that random shots fired on the GSU campus last week shut down the university and “that’s the kind of environment this bill creates.”

Presidents of the University of Louisiana System and Community and Technical College System campuses and student government presidents statewide have adopted resolutions opposing the bill.

Savoie urged the committee to do as 13 other states have done and defeat the proposal.

Campus police chiefs from across the state joined Salvador in opposition to the measure.

UL Monroe Police Chief Larry Ellerman, a police and military veteran, said he doubts students and faculty members could remain calm with guns in their hands if there was a disturbance on a campus.

He said he has witnessed trained officers under fire and “people react differently.” He said in such stressful moments, even trained police officers “20 percent of the time hit what they’re aiming at.”

Noting that the doors of the state Capitol bear signs warning that it is a firearm-free zone, Savoie said, “It is not less important to protect college students on campus than it is to protect legislators at this state Capitol.”

Despite objections that it could lead to, as expressed by state Rep. Barbara Norton, D-Shreveport, “the wild, wild West,” the committee approved House Bill 199 with an 11-3 vote and sent it to the full House for debate.

“This really scares me,” said state Rep. Roy Burrell, D-Shreveport, one of the three committee members who voted against the proposal. “A bullet has no name, no respect for a person. Who would decide who shoots who and when?” if a police officer answers a call to a shooting and arrives to find several people holding a gun.

State Rep. Ernest Wooton, D-Belle Chasse, author of HB199 and chairman of the House Criminal Justice Committee, said his bill would not lead to more violence on campus and “We’re not going to have a run on concealed gun permits. We’re not going to have 20,000 students lined up Monday morning to get a concealed gun permit.”

Louisiana law requires that applicants for concealed weapons permits be at least 21 years of age and submit to a background check.

Committee member Joseph Lopinto, a former Jefferson Parish sheriff’s deputy, said that in the past 12 years Louisiana has allowed the public to get permits to carry concealed weapons, 1,830 have been issued to people 21 to 30 years old. He said probably less than 200 of those are issued to college-aged students.

“It’s not about the Virginia Tech shootings,” Lopinto said. “It’s about you walking to your car at night.”

and this from today concerning the debate

Campus-gun debate hot

Panel backs bill to allow carrying weapons at schools

* By JORDAN BLUM
* Advocate Capitol News Bureau
* Published: May 2, 2008 - Page: 1A - UPDATED: 12:05 a.m.

Legalizing permitted handguns on college campuses took its first major step toward approval Thursday after three hours of debate in a legislative committee.

Gun advocates, faculty, students and college police chiefs lined up on all sides of the controversial issue that has arisen in the wake of campus shootings nationwide, including at LSU and Baton Rouge’s Louisiana Technical College.

House Bill 199 by Rep. Ernest Wooten, R-Belle Chasse, was approved in an 11-3 vote in the House Criminal Justice Committee. HB199 next moves to debate in the full House.

Wooten said allowing more responsible people to legally carry guns would serve as a deterrent to killers and not create the “wild, wild west.”

Rep. Barbara Norton, D-Shreveport countered, “It’s supposed to be higher education and higher learning, but it seems to me we’re preparing for war.”

Although most of the students who testified opposed the legislation, Southeastern Louisiana University College Republican Geoffrey Green said he only wants to be able to defend his friends if necessary.

“I feel defenseless,” said Green, who legally must keep a gun in his vehicle on campus. “It’s not fair that we’re not able to defend ourselves.”

“Where I spend most of my time, I am mandated to be unprotected,” LSU law student Elizabeth Cooke added.

Southern University student body president Carey Ash said the focus should be on increasing police staffing, not adding more guns. Ash warned that changing the law would harm the recruitment of out-of-state students.

“It is worrisome to not only worry about class grades, but who next to you might have a gun,” said Ash, who chairs the Louisiana Council of Student Body Presidents.

Grambling State University student body vice president Steven Jackson said he sees a more “hostile environment” with more guns on campuses.

“We should be talking about textbooks. We should be talking about scholarships,” Jackson said. “We shouldn’t be talking about guns on college campuses.”

To apply for a permit, a Louisiana resident must be at least 21 years old, take some training and not have a felony record.

HB199 would make it legal to carry licensed, concealed handguns on all public and private colleges, from technical schools to universities.

The National Rifle Association-backed bill also would forbid colleges from limiting the rights of gun owners from carrying concealed handguns. The bill would only allow colleges to regulate the safeguarding of guns when they are put away.

The state’s list of “firearm-free zones” now includes schools and colleges.

Utah is the only state that allows handguns on campuses. Several other states, particularly in the South, have already rejected proposed college handgun bills this year.

State Commissioner of Higher Education Joseph Savoie emphasized that the bill will not allow campuses to regulate themselves.

“What we’re talking about is taking away the authority of the colleges to protect their students,” Savoie said.

Savoie said permitted gun carriers from students to food-service personnel would be carrying handguns from classrooms to LSU’s Tiger Stadium.

“That gives new meaning to Death Valley,” Savoie said.

In the last few months, two international students at LSU were murdered in an on-campus apartment. Weeks later, a Louisiana Technical College student killed two classmates before killing herself.

In 2001-2005, there were 43 murders on college campuses nationwide out of 18 million students, Savoie said.

There were 49 homicides in 2005 in Baton Rouge alone, he said.

“College campuses are much safer than the communities that surround them,” Savoie said, arguing that adding more guns will only increase the risk.

Maurice Franks, a Southern University Law Center professor, said he feels unsafe walking from his office to his car late at night.

“It (the law) allows me to carry a handgun just about everywhere in Louisiana except where I need it most,” Franks said.

NRA representative Tara Mica said only about 25,000 concealed handgun permits were issued in the past 12 years in Louisiana. That would mean only few additional guns on campuses, she said.

McNeese State University Police Chief Cinnamon Salvador said 93 percent of crimes against college students occur off campus.
Also, college students are more prone to abuse alcohol, drugs and to attempt suicide.

“You add firearms to the mix, it’s going to be deadly,” she said.

Noting that the state Capitol is a gun-free zone, Salvador said, “If you believe for one second that concealed firearms are our best defense, then why aren’t we allowed to carry firearms here today?”

Voting for the bill were Wooton and Reps. Damon Baldone, D-Houma; Elbert Guillory, D-Opelousas; Mickey Guillory, D-Eunice; Chris Hazel, R-Ball; Joseph Lopinto, R-Metairie; Nick Lorusso, R-New Orleans; John Schroder, R-Covington; Gary Smith, D-Norco; Ricky Templet, R-Gretna; and Bodi White, R-Central.

Voting against the bill were Norton and Reps. Roy Burrell, D-Shreveport, and Frankie Howard, R-Hornbeck.

On Saturday May 3, the Times Picayune weighs in on the subject

Jazz Fest musings part 2 - the food

From moldy city comes a link to an article in City Business on the skyrocketing cost of being a Jazz Fest food vendor

Recipe to serve at Fest not always easy to follow
Muffaletta vendor can’t raise price to offset cost
by Emilie Bahr

Betty Dupont of Di Martino’s Famous New Orleans Muffalettas places layers of salami on Muffalettas places layers of salami on sandwiches to be sold at Jazz Fest. (Photo by Frank Aymami)
Betty Dupont of Di Martino’s Famous New Orleans Muffalettas places layers of salami on Muffalettas places layers of salami on sandwiches to be sold at Jazz Fest. (Photo by Frank Aymami)

In February 2003, Peter Di Martino got the news he’d long hoped to hear. The muffuletta vendor at the New Orleans Jazz and Heritage Festival had pulled out.

Di Martino, who more than three decades ago opened DiMartino’s Famous New Orleans Muffulettas in Terrytown and has since grown the business to three West Bank locations, said selling what he considers the city’s signature sandwich at the city’s signature festival was “one of the things I always wanted to do.”

But as long as someone else was selling muffulettas, he wasn’t likely to be called upon. Festival organizers, he said, shy away from duplication.

“You really get to represent the city with a product that was started in this city,” Di Martino said of the appeal of working Jazz Fest. “Obviously,” he added, “you try to make money too.”

But what might appear to be an easy jackpot is not necessarily so, festival organizers and vendors say, and success comes at a significant price.

In his first year, Di Martino, who was notified about a month before opening weekend of his selection as a Jazz Fest vendor, said he spent $15,000 on the kitchen supplies, shelving, safe and other equipment required for his booth at the festival. He also spends between $7,000 and $10,000 each year in booth rental fees, to say nothing of the money spent on the 2,000 pounds of meat, 3,000 loaves of bread and 200 gallons of olive salad he estimated goes into the operation each year.

The cost for those provisions is up significantly this year, Di Martino said, thanks to a spike in food prices exacerbated by a declining dollar that makes his European-imported salami and olive products particularly pricey.

In what he described as one example of the highly-regulated environment confronted by prospective festival vendors, Di Martino said he wanted to raise the price for his Jazz Fest muffulettas from $5 to $6 this year to account for those inflated wholesale costs. Festival organizers, he said, wouldn’t let him.

More than five dozen food vendors are scheduled for this year’s Jazz Fest. A handful, including Angelo Brocato’s, Fatty’s Cracklins of St. Francisville and Creole’s Lunch House of Lafayette, return for the first time since 2005.

For some festival attendees, the food is a bigger draw than the music, said Wendy Waren, spokeswoman for the Louisiana Restaurant Association.

“I never get close to any of the music stages,” food critic Tom Fitzmorris admitted in a recent Web log on the topic, “but I will be eating about half the selection of food.”

Last Monday afternoon, well after the lunch rush had subsided, the kitchen at Di Martino’s Terrytown restaurant buzzed with activity.

A long steel counter was covered with sheets of wax paper piled thick with stacks of meat and cheese to be vacuum sealed and stored for Jazz Fest’s opening weekend.

“The muffuletta sandwich,” Di Martino said as he joked with his kitchen staff, “is very labor intensive. It’s not like you can throw it together.”

Out at the Fair Grounds, at least a dozen people, among them Di Martino and his children, staff the restaurant’s booth. They arrive before 8 a.m. and leave 12 sweaty hours later, after all the crowds have dispersed.

“Jazz Fest is a killer for me and I’ve been working since I was 7 years old,” said Di Martino, now 59. “Jazz Fest is like the king of work. It takes us a week to recover, just physically.”

Is all the investment in time, energy and capital worthwhile?

“It’s not an easy call,” he said. “Like they say, ‘Jazz Fest is not for everyone.’ It does give you some added revenue. But it’s not an easy chore. Every year you have to figure out it if it’s worth it.”

For five years, Di Martino has decided it is.

Some spillway pictures from last week

got these in an e-mail - check out all that sediment flowing into the lake

Jazz Fest musings

Another Jazz Fest is upon New Orleans and here’s some observations

First, the articles from the Saturday Times Picayune about JF bargain versus burden, and a breakdown of how the price has increased by 100% in just 4 years

The current state of JF

JF a bargain?

JF a burden?

JAZZFEST INFLATION
The cost of a ticket at the gate of the 2008 New Orleans Jazz and Heritage Festival presented by Shell is more than three times higher than in 1998.
1998: $16
1999: $18
2000: $20
2001: $20
2002: $25
2003: $25
2004: $25
2005: $35
2006: $40
2007: $45
2008: $50

So today a friend and I went and confirmed my notion that Jazz Fest has become an experience for out-of-towners. Sure there were some locals, but the patois I heard all day was definitely NOT New Orleans-ese. There was no character to the crowd, it felt like the Geriatric Fest, all white-bread and mushy. Hardly any younguns. Folding chairs were everywhere, with no room to dance especially in the tents. Chairs take up too much space and leave nowhere to navigate - and heaven forbid you touch someone’s chair or the death stare will fall upon you. Plus the chairs do not allow for any kind of dancing, just sitting. And sitting leads to other activities such as reading a hard cover novel and playing an electronic Sudoku game. I mean what the fuck? You are at Jazz Fest and you are reading a fucking novel? Jeebus, give your damn ticket to the lady sitting on her porch on Mystery Street and I’ll gar-on-tee you she’ll have a better time than you and will probably get up and dance you under your damn folding chair. Wanna read your book, stay the fuck home…

We felt corralled in outside as well. Jazz Fest organizers have laid claim to practically every speck of free space on the infield and have closed off all access to the grass between the stages and along the perimeters. Cutting across the infield to avoid the cattle runs of the walking track was much more difficult. And if one wanted to drop a blanket between Fais-Do-Do and the Gentilly stage it wasn’t happening - there was a fence and at least 6 mobile home trailers parked nose to nose and fenced in. This repeated itself at every stage. Speaking of fenced in, the organizers have taken to erecting plastic and bamboo shields on all the fencing, all of which was 6 foot high, to close everything off. No more NOPD parade route barricades, just barriers. Barriers to sightlines, barriers to people, barriers for the well heeled and well connected and the worker bees. A bona-fide labyrinth.

And even more barriers to the big stages with access to the very front reserved to the ones lucky to have procured certain colored wrist bands with the “Grand Marshall” Pass. Even brass passers were turned away from the prime front and center stage real estate and there were some ticked off folks flashing that pass bling. Guess all that brass pass got you was some fruit and a chair to sit in, even the benevolent donation to WWOZ couldn’t get them to the front of the stage - must have been the Big Chiefers, the ones that perch on the second story covered scaffolding, looking down on the crowd and eye level to the musicians.

I did find out while chatting with one of the women serving up beer that the distributors take all the old beer that was pulled off the shelves, past the beer expiration date (what is it, a month?) and that is the stock that is served at the Fest. I knew there was a reason why I drink whiskey…

Parking in the fair grounds was out the roof - $50 and pretty much only handicapped spaces available. Some cock and bull story about the stables being under construction was the excuse. The food was priced high and the portions were smaller. And water… three dollars for a bottle of water. That was the last straw, that water was commanding such a premium that left the bad taste in my mouth. Before the rain came today, I noticed the crowd was thinner than I ever remember for a Saturday. Jazz Fest has priced itself out of the ballpark and locals have turned their backs on it. Even more sad, the New Orleans spirit has left the fest, which is unforgivable. In a small corner of my mind, I feel for the tourists, that they are getting a sterilized version of a New Orleans circus show…but then again maybe I don’t, especially if you’re one of those turistas bringing your latest novel with you to pass the time at the fest…